<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCAA: your one-stop retching here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/19/scaa_your_one_stop_retching_here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/19/scaa_your_one_stop_retching_here/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:27:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/19/scaa_your_one_stop_retching_here/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-128</guid>
		<description>all good points, rich. clearly, a very-young infant exception seems logical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
david spade on coffee? scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all good points, rich. clearly, a very-young infant exception seems logical.</p>
<p>david spade on coffee? scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Westerfield</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/19/scaa_your_one_stop_retching_here/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Westerfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-127</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;trying to roast a marshmallow over hot molten streams of lava&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like that analogy... a great visual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To your points on the kids on the floor - see my post following yours.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve done way too many shows for way too many associations to offer any optimism that things will change regarding being kid - or more accurately - parent-friendly.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s naive to suggest that there&#039;s little risk to SCAA in letting toddlers toddle.  Too many things on the floor that can burn, poke, prod, chop and otherwise harm.  And waivers?  Puleeeeeze.  When it&#039;s your kid and s/he gets hurt, all that waiver means is that you&#039;ll be on Nancy Grace claiming you didn&#039;t know the danger.  Cigarette?  Hot coffee?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And associations, by their very nature, are loathe to take risks.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But we&#039;ve both spoken our piece on that.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Really, parents should get together and talk to David at CoffeeFest.  Convince him to take the lead on being parent-friendly.  If he thinks it will be worth it in the long run, he&#039;ll make the changes without too much difficulty.  If he does so and gets positive feedback (and financials), then SCAA will have to follow.  But don&#039;t ask SCAA to lead regarding show policies.  That&#039;s not an association strength and you&#039;ll turn blue waiting for it, especially given their current position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note the above doesn&#039;t apply to infants in papooses or backpacks strapped to adults, whom present no danger.  Yes, there should be a private room for breastfeeding, or prayer or whatever personal stuff attendees need.  And yes, security should be nicer to people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Btw, I like the podcasts.  Eventually someone will come along and act our industry&#039;s David Spade, or worse,  Joan and Melissa Rivers.  So be thankful while you have Nick and Jay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;trying to roast a marshmallow over hot molten streams of lava&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I like that analogy&#8230; a great visual.</p>
<p>To your points on the kids on the floor &#8211; see my post following yours.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done way too many shows for way too many associations to offer any optimism that things will change regarding being kid &#8211; or more accurately &#8211; parent-friendly.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s naive to suggest that there&#8217;s little risk to SCAA in letting toddlers toddle.  Too many things on the floor that can burn, poke, prod, chop and otherwise harm.  And waivers?  Puleeeeeze.  When it&#8217;s your kid and s/he gets hurt, all that waiver means is that you&#8217;ll be on Nancy Grace claiming you didn&#8217;t know the danger.  Cigarette?  Hot coffee?</p>
<p>And associations, by their very nature, are loathe to take risks.  </p>
<p>But we&#8217;ve both spoken our piece on that.  </p>
<p>Really, parents should get together and talk to David at CoffeeFest.  Convince him to take the lead on being parent-friendly.  If he thinks it will be worth it in the long run, he&#8217;ll make the changes without too much difficulty.  If he does so and gets positive feedback (and financials), then SCAA will have to follow.  But don&#8217;t ask SCAA to lead regarding show policies.  That&#8217;s not an association strength and you&#8217;ll turn blue waiting for it, especially given their current position. </p>
<p>Note the above doesn&#8217;t apply to infants in papooses or backpacks strapped to adults, whom present no danger.  Yes, there should be a private room for breastfeeding, or prayer or whatever personal stuff attendees need.  And yes, security should be nicer to people. </p>
<p>Btw, I like the podcasts.  Eventually someone will come along and act our industry&#8217;s David Spade, or worse,  Joan and Melissa Rivers.  So be thankful while you have Nick and Jay&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/19/scaa_your_one_stop_retching_here/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-126</guid>
		<description>huh. sounds like ... like an &lt;i&gt;echo chamber&lt;/i&gt; in here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
if that&#039;s your point, nick, then it&#039;s a point well taken. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh. sounds like &#8230; like an <i>echo chamber</i> in here.</p>
<p>if that&#8217;s your point, nick, then it&#8217;s a point well taken. <img src='http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/19/scaa_your_one_stop_retching_here/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 06:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-125</guid>
		<description>HELLO?  HELLO?  HELLO?  hello?  hello?  hello?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HELLO?  HELLO?  HELLO?  hello?  hello?  hello?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
