<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCAA/USBC: breaking-ish old news here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:52:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-140</guid>
		<description>now THAT is a dose of cynicism truly worthy of this blog. excellent!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
also: reactionary illinois-bashing is the best idea i&#039;ve heard in awhile. chicago -- it&#039;s the new seattle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now THAT is a dose of cynicism truly worthy of this blog. excellent!</p>
<p>also: reactionary illinois-bashing is the best idea i&#8217;ve heard in awhile. chicago &#8212; it&#8217;s the new seattle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikep</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>mikep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-142</guid>
		<description>hmm, what i find interesting is the fact that this blog did not question the lack of a first round score from Mr. Dennhardt. Is there an anti-Chicago bias here?? but wait! there was also one finalist that this blog did not videotape. and in what state does Mr. Fritzen reside?&lt;br /&gt;
Illinois.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, what i find interesting is the fact that this blog did not question the lack of a first round score from Mr. Dennhardt. Is there an anti-Chicago bias here?? but wait! there was also one finalist that this blog did not videotape. and in what state does Mr. Fritzen reside?<br />
Illinois.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-141</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;He didn&#039;t need one as he had the bye from the great lakes regionals.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
stupid. i had totally forgotten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He didn&#8217;t need one as he had the bye from the great lakes regionals.</i></p>
<p>stupid. i had totally forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Westerfield</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Westerfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Not sure if you were being facetious or not on Matt&#039;s 1st round score.  He didn&#039;t need one as he had the bye from the great lakes regionals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interesting note on the results from the NC competitors... not sure but I think there were a lot of time penalities there.  They&#039;ll get better.  And murky... many of us think Ryan was a bit under the weather although Nick claimed no.  Not Ryan&#039;s A game, which we saw at the MARBC.  He&#039;s good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But hey, let&#039;s talk about the real news... Pittsburgh, #25!  W00t.  And it looked like all the judges downed her entire fig sig.  &lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if you were being facetious or not on Matt&#8217;s 1st round score.  He didn&#8217;t need one as he had the bye from the great lakes regionals.</p>
<p>Interesting note on the results from the NC competitors&#8230; not sure but I think there were a lot of time penalities there.  They&#8217;ll get better.  And murky&#8230; many of us think Ryan was a bit under the weather although Nick claimed no.  Not Ryan&#8217;s A game, which we saw at the MARBC.  He&#8217;s good.</p>
<p>But hey, let&#8217;s talk about the real news&#8230; Pittsburgh, #25!  W00t.  And it looked like all the judges downed her entire fig sig.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-144</guid>
		<description>... which is one reason i really got into billy&#039;s performance this year. from what i&#039;ve heard about past comps, it was the first time he made it about the coffee, poured his heart and soul into it, instead of making it about himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; which is one reason i really got into billy&#8217;s performance this year. from what i&#8217;ve heard about past comps, it was the first time he made it about the coffee, poured his heart and soul into it, instead of making it about himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-145</guid>
		<description>you know, i honestly had no idea about some of these intra-continental tensions. if i had, i would have stoked the fire a lot sooner!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
uh, no. i&#039;m not trying to america-bash. but sometimes the difference between our tendency to define things in &quot;rock-star barista&quot; terms and the intellectual humility of a troels or wendelboe is just too stark to escape notice. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, i honestly had no idea about some of these intra-continental tensions. if i had, i would have stoked the fire a lot sooner!</p>
<p>uh, no. i&#8217;m not trying to america-bash. but sometimes the difference between our tendency to define things in &#8220;rock-star barista&#8221; terms and the intellectual humility of a troels or wendelboe is just too stark to escape notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-138</guid>
		<description>No doubt then, you&#039;ve heard about Cafe Art Java in Montreal... lots of East Coaster Americans have. And that&#039;s just one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specialty coffee, the &quot;third wave&quot; it&#039;s a very slow concept taking off outside of the PNW, mainly because of how ingrained Timmy Ho&#039;s and Second Cup is in Eastern Canada. If you think Starbucks saturates the market in the US, you ain&#039;t seen nothing yet until you see how Tim Hortons dominates parts of Canada. But, that too is changing. There&#039;s even cafes in Ottawa now that I can recommend, whereas two years ago, it looked hopeless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt then, you&#8217;ve heard about Cafe Art Java in Montreal&#8230; lots of East Coaster Americans have. And that&#8217;s just one.</p>
<p>Specialty coffee, the &#8220;third wave&#8221; it&#8217;s a very slow concept taking off outside of the PNW, mainly because of how ingrained Timmy Ho&#8217;s and Second Cup is in Eastern Canada. If you think Starbucks saturates the market in the US, you ain&#8217;t seen nothing yet until you see how Tim Hortons dominates parts of Canada. But, that too is changing. There&#8217;s even cafes in Ottawa now that I can recommend, whereas two years ago, it looked hopeless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-139</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;your comment shows a certain ignorance about what&#039;s currently going on in Montreal and Toronto, just to name two places, in Canada.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m only going by what my Canadian friends have said.  I wouldn&#039;t make that sort of comment based just on my own ugly-American perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;your comment shows a certain ignorance about what&#8217;s currently going on in Montreal and Toronto, just to name two places, in Canada.&#8221;</i><br />
I&#8217;m only going by what my Canadian friends have said.  I wouldn&#8217;t make that sort of comment based just on my own ugly-American perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Just to cover the &quot;Vancouver&quot; comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, it&#039;s true that the CNBC right now is about primarily the PNW region. Just like how, up until a few short years ago, the USBC was primarily about the PNW region. But Nick, while most Canadians who follow these things are very aware of the regionals in the US (and no, not because you&#039;re &quot;the US&quot; but because they find it interesting to follow other national comps), your comment shows a certain ignorance about what&#039;s currently going on in Montreal and Toronto, just to name two places, in Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, I&#039;d be very surprised if we didn&#039;t have at least two or more in the top six at this year&#039;s CNBC from those areas. And maybe the Canadian rep at the 2008 or 2009 AWBC (oops, slip) will be a Montrealer, or (gasp), maybe even a person from Halifax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to cover the &#8220;Vancouver&#8221; comment.</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s true that the CNBC right now is about primarily the PNW region. Just like how, up until a few short years ago, the USBC was primarily about the PNW region. But Nick, while most Canadians who follow these things are very aware of the regionals in the US (and no, not because you&#8217;re &#8220;the US&#8221; but because they find it interesting to follow other national comps), your comment shows a certain ignorance about what&#8217;s currently going on in Montreal and Toronto, just to name two places, in Canada.</p>
<p>In fact, I&#8217;d be very surprised if we didn&#8217;t have at least two or more in the top six at this year&#8217;s CNBC from those areas. And maybe the Canadian rep at the 2008 or 2009 AWBC (oops, slip) will be a Montrealer, or (gasp), maybe even a person from Halifax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-133</guid>
		<description>nice. and also true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice. and also true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-135</guid>
		<description>In response to Mr. Mark Coffeegeek:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- speculation? behind-the-scenes whispering?  Some people would call it open discussion.  You seem to be advocating &#039;circling the wagons.&#039;  Very interesting :-)&lt;br /&gt;
- Wanna know why the Scandinavians can have &quot;everyone pitching in?&quot;  Denmark: 43,000 sq km, or slightly less than twice the size of Massachusetts.  Norway: 324,000 sq km, or slightly larger than New Mexico.  U.S.A.: 9,631,000 sq km.  WBC-knowledgable folks from the Seattle area &quot;pitched in&quot; to help Phuong last year.  Riddle has the full-support from WBC-knowledgable folks in the US as well.  However, the sad fact is, geography&#039;s a bitch.&lt;br /&gt;
- And as far as I know, and with all due respect to folks in Canada, the Canadian Nationals is all about Vancouver, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Mr. Mark Coffeegeek:</p>
<p>- speculation? behind-the-scenes whispering?  Some people would call it open discussion.  You seem to be advocating &#8216;circling the wagons.&#8217;  Very interesting <img src='http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
- Wanna know why the Scandinavians can have &#8220;everyone pitching in?&#8221;  Denmark: 43,000 sq km, or slightly less than twice the size of Massachusetts.  Norway: 324,000 sq km, or slightly larger than New Mexico.  U.S.A.: 9,631,000 sq km.  WBC-knowledgable folks from the Seattle area &#8220;pitched in&#8221; to help Phuong last year.  Riddle has the full-support from WBC-knowledgable folks in the US as well.  However, the sad fact is, geography&#8217;s a bitch.<br />
- And as far as I know, and with all due respect to folks in Canada, the Canadian Nationals is all about Vancouver, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-136</guid>
		<description>mark:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
excellent point. and though i&#039;m just bloviating as an outsider, i will attempt a vastly overreaching answer to your (rhetorical) question about why a canadian has to make the point about teamwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this country is about individuals. always has been. and i think it becomes a handicap on a global scale, where (as you pointed out) a more communal approach seems to come so much easier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
not to say americans can&#039;t do it in the wbc, but for the culture in general it just doesn&#039;t come naturally. don&#039;t get me started on the examples. (bode miller, anyone?) this is one reason why, someday, i am going to live in europe. (no, none of this means i&#039;m a bush-basher. got nothing to do with it.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
when i came back from france in feb., we did a little exercise in the detroit airport. we simply observed how americans walk in a public place. we observed how they talked, how they ate, how they looked around. and then we compared it to the way the frenchies conduct themselves in similar public places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
very illuminating. you didn&#039;t ask for this, but i would submit that our problems in the wbc are but one tiny example of the individualistic competitiveness of americans in general, and how it tends to isolate. i may have inadvertently contributed to this mindset with my post ... but that wasn&#039;t my intent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mark:</p>
<p>excellent point. and though i&#8217;m just bloviating as an outsider, i will attempt a vastly overreaching answer to your (rhetorical) question about why a canadian has to make the point about teamwork.</p>
<p>this country is about individuals. always has been. and i think it becomes a handicap on a global scale, where (as you pointed out) a more communal approach seems to come so much easier.</p>
<p>not to say americans can&#8217;t do it in the wbc, but for the culture in general it just doesn&#8217;t come naturally. don&#8217;t get me started on the examples. (bode miller, anyone?) this is one reason why, someday, i am going to live in europe. (no, none of this means i&#8217;m a bush-basher. got nothing to do with it.)</p>
<p>when i came back from france in feb., we did a little exercise in the detroit airport. we simply observed how americans walk in a public place. we observed how they talked, how they ate, how they looked around. and then we compared it to the way the frenchies conduct themselves in similar public places.</p>
<p>very illuminating. you didn&#8217;t ask for this, but i would submit that our problems in the wbc are but one tiny example of the individualistic competitiveness of americans in general, and how it tends to isolate. i may have inadvertently contributed to this mindset with my post &#8230; but that wasn&#8217;t my intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/04/22/scaa_usbc_breaking_ish_old_news_here/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Matt&#039;s the champ. Any speculation or behind-the-scenes whispering or grumbling about what could have should have out or not out stuff will only be detrimental to the US&#039;s chances of placing well in this year&#039;s WBC. Told that to Nick last night, and I&#039;ll say it here again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does a Canadian have to point that out ;) Already, the phone lines and the texting are burning up a bit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wanna know why the Scandinavians always do well in world comps? Because once their nationals are over, it&#039;s a national team sport, with everyone pitching in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ditto for Sammy (though to a lesser extent - Sammy really just is that good) - after Nationals, Sammy&#039;s competitors and his company&#039;s competition have come together in previous years to help him through judging flights, discussion about the comp, you name it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt&#8217;s the champ. Any speculation or behind-the-scenes whispering or grumbling about what could have should have out or not out stuff will only be detrimental to the US&#8217;s chances of placing well in this year&#8217;s WBC. Told that to Nick last night, and I&#8217;ll say it here again.</p>
<p>Why does a Canadian have to point that out <img src='http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Already, the phone lines and the texting are burning up a bit.</p>
<p>Wanna know why the Scandinavians always do well in world comps? Because once their nationals are over, it&#8217;s a national team sport, with everyone pitching in.</p>
<p>Ditto for Sammy (though to a lesser extent &#8211; Sammy really just is that good) &#8211; after Nationals, Sammy&#8217;s competitors and his company&#8217;s competition have come together in previous years to help him through judging flights, discussion about the comp, you name it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

