<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CI, personal research assistant to rich westerfield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/07/31/ligcil_ig_personal_research_assistant_to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/07/31/ligcil_ig_personal_research_assistant_to/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:52:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/07/31/ligcil_ig_personal_research_assistant_to/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-254</guid>
		<description>&gt;Rich&#039;s note of Astringency would likely lead to a need of much cooler temps to dull the intensity of the flavors out to a more palatable level. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
you&#039;d think so ... but that only heightened the problem for me. this is most likely because the &quot;astringency&quot; was more a problem of sours, at least in my own experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;I have never tasted an espresso that was pleasant at 204F measured at the group head, especially a coffee roasted for drip which would pull at a much lower temp than even 198F. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
nor have i. although this coffee was NOT roasted for drip. rich&#039;s (intelly-roasted) batch may have been. i did my own roasting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&gt; Most of the pundits decrying the SO is lacking are pulling either too high, incorrect dose, or just want something else but won&#039;t admit it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i agree. although in this case the need for a very high brew temp was rather startling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Rich&#8217;s note of Astringency would likely lead to a need of much cooler temps to dull the intensity of the flavors out to a more palatable level. </p>
<p>you&#8217;d think so &#8230; but that only heightened the problem for me. this is most likely because the &#8220;astringency&#8221; was more a problem of sours, at least in my own experience.</p>
<p>>I have never tasted an espresso that was pleasant at 204F measured at the group head, especially a coffee roasted for drip which would pull at a much lower temp than even 198F. </p>
<p>nor have i. although this coffee was NOT roasted for drip. rich&#8217;s (intelly-roasted) batch may have been. i did my own roasting.</p>
<p>> Most of the pundits decrying the SO is lacking are pulling either too high, incorrect dose, or just want something else but won&#8217;t admit it.</p>
<p>i agree. although in this case the need for a very high brew temp was rather startling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/07/31/ligcil_ig_personal_research_assistant_to/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Rich&#039;s note of Astringency would likely lead to a need of much cooler temps to dull the intensity of the flavors out to a more palatable level.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have never tasted an espresso that was pleasant at 204F measured at the group head, especially a coffee roasted for drip which would pull at a much lower temp than even 198F. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the pundits decrying the SO is lacking are pulling either too high, incorrect dose, or just want something else but won&#039;t admit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich&#8217;s note of Astringency would likely lead to a need of much cooler temps to dull the intensity of the flavors out to a more palatable level.  </p>
<p>I have never tasted an espresso that was pleasant at 204F measured at the group head, especially a coffee roasted for drip which would pull at a much lower temp than even 198F. </p>
<p>Most of the pundits decrying the SO is lacking are pulling either too high, incorrect dose, or just want something else but won&#8217;t admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/07/31/ligcil_ig_personal_research_assistant_to/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-252</guid>
		<description>phil: alistair tells me linking to coffeed is cool with him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
rich: the lozenge scrub was basically across a large spectrum of coooler temperatures (not that i tested that posit all THAT rigorously, since i had no inclination to waste shots. in fact, i think i drank every drop of ez we brewed -- inlcuding the cupping liquid.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
actually, i&#039;m not sure if i&#039;ve ever found a coffee that brewed ideally at 204, which may somehow say to some people that the ez is not espresso-ideal. but i don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phil: alistair tells me linking to coffeed is cool with him.</p>
<p>rich: the lozenge scrub was basically across a large spectrum of coooler temperatures (not that i tested that posit all THAT rigorously, since i had no inclination to waste shots. in fact, i think i drank every drop of ez we brewed &#8212; inlcuding the cupping liquid.).</p>
<p>actually, i&#8217;m not sure if i&#8217;ve ever found a coffee that brewed ideally at 204, which may somehow say to some people that the ez is not espresso-ideal. but i don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Westerfield</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/07/31/ligcil_ig_personal_research_assistant_to/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Westerfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 04:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-251</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m honored to have a post on CI dedicated to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Never let it be said that you&#039;re a man who does not keep his word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, it was the 204.  Interesting you got the lozenge at 198.  We were at ~201.  But that may play into Jaime&#039;s point that the roast was designed for press.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, happy it worked for you.  Meantime, we&#039;ll limit our CoE experiments to those beans cost us less than $20/lb!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m honored to have a post on CI dedicated to me.</p>
<p>Never let it be said that you&#8217;re a man who does not keep his word.</p>
<p>So, it was the 204.  Interesting you got the lozenge at 198.  We were at ~201.  But that may play into Jaime&#8217;s point that the roast was designed for press.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, happy it worked for you.  Meantime, we&#8217;ll limit our CoE experiments to those beans cost us less than $20/lb!</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bz</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/07/31/ligcil_ig_personal_research_assistant_to/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>bz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-250</guid>
		<description>&gt;Thought you weren&#039;t supposed to link coffeed though?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i haven&#039;t been informed of this, though i&#039;ve heard talk of it elsewhere. i&#039;ve linked to coffeed on the right for months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Thought you weren&#8217;t supposed to link coffeed though?</p>
<p>i haven&#8217;t been informed of this, though i&#8217;ve heard talk of it elsewhere. i&#8217;ve linked to coffeed on the right for months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/07/31/ligcil_ig_personal_research_assistant_to/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-249</guid>
		<description>As always, sacrificing precious moments of your life to bring these brilliant run-downs. Great writing dude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thought you weren&#039;t supposed to link coffeed though?&lt;br /&gt;
Guess it doesn&#039;t really matter now it&#039;s invite only, pity Alistair changed that before I could join :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, sacrificing precious moments of your life to bring these brilliant run-downs. Great writing dude.</p>
<p>Thought you weren&#8217;t supposed to link coffeed though?<br />
Guess it doesn&#8217;t really matter now it&#8217;s invite only, pity Alistair changed that before I could join <img src='http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

