SERBC: your stark-raving apology, right here

September 24, 2006 – 10:40 pm

there’s crow. and then there’s your large-breasted, turkey-sized raven, fluffed to the size of nick cho’s hair, embalmed with liquified mr. crow, marinated in compote de crow-chick and basted in its own nest. i’ll take a full helping of the latter, with some jus de crow as a digestif.

because despite the automotive work, serial chest-thumping, 6 a.m. departure, nine hours of total driving, the infinite patience of this blog’s family and close to 10 cans of off-brand energy syrup, we have no video of today’s serbc. none. nary a flicker.

the Shameful Fiasco of Shame-Faced Shame went something like this: test the camera outdoors on the blogchildren, as a super-anal precautionary measure. it works! walk inside, push record, and track every momentous flick of the wrist for each of six solid finalists. no worky. it’s as if the device’s cyclops eye lapsed into a coma, and banished what it saw to a section of the brain where pictures are irretrievable. this blog, mind you, has a very familiar knowledge of this camera. the light was red. the beeps all beeped just right. the battery even ran out at one point (so we plugged it in). and yet, all i got on my digital tape is matt riddle putting fig on a sig. how does a camera run out of juice by not recording?!

at this very moment, this blog’s stat counter is racking up hits from all the usual watering holes, where dan kehn has promised … video! moving pictures, of baristi doing innovative things! yes, well. hullo. i can, uh, paint you word pictures … i’m a writer! nick’s shirt was pink, see? pink as his pink … uh, tie. nick was pink!

you. will see no valiant attempt by defending champ lem butler to stave off his challengers, at least two of whom surely had more money, access and time with which to train for his unseating. no lena abed, keeping a steely composure as nick cho, who was warming up nearby, flipped a hopper of beans onto the floor with a crash, then proceeded to walk all over them in his hard-soled shoes. no cho, burbling his test shots in his mouth in the peculiar manner of a blowfish or telling the story of coffee farmer ada — who was sitting in the stands. no judge marcus, with an expression that seemed to say, “keep it together. he’s just another competitor. you don’t know him, marcus.” no michelle bradicich, effervescing endearingly all over the place. no ryan goodrow, conscientiously going over time because he loved his espresso so much, he just had to redo two of the shots.

in the stands, lena must have kindly ducked under the NON-RECORDING RETROMINGENT STUPID CARPING RATSBANE CROW-HUFFING camera five different times — for naught. all that product in cho’s hair — for what? lem used the words “sexy foam” and “vortex” in the same sentence — but how will you know? the seed-to-cup imagery. the homemade candied pumpkin rind. the “secret sauce.”

*sigh* we will now weep gargantuan rock-salt tear-chunks. we will also wait to type a more coherent recap of the finalists and their drinks tomorrow, when the bile has receded from this blog’s trachea. that is, we’ll type what we can. the notes, they’re less than copious. we were manning the camera.

there is a proper way, i’m sure, to break this news to blogwife, who roused the midgets in the wee hours, fed them and changed them in skanky rest stops, whisked them out of the competition theater before they could disrupt, waited in the lobby two hours past lunch and soothed the crotchedy rascals all the way home. and it’s not, “hey! the, uh, camera didn’t work.”

  1. 14 Responses to “SERBC: your stark-raving apology, right here”

  2. aww, hell.

    By billy wilson on Sep 24, 2006

  3. maybe you could dress up the blog-fam and re-enact the finals… and video that?

    By )on on Sep 24, 2006

  4. billy: TELL ME ABOUT IT!

    jon: NOT FUNNY!

    (deep breaths, deep breaths)

    you know what REALLY burns me up? i just video taped this computer screen. and it looks beautiful!

    p.s. nick’s sig was very smooth. somewhat klausian. more tomorrow.

    By bz on Sep 25, 2006

  5. did you forget the lens cap? that always gets me

    By billy wilson on Sep 25, 2006

  6. the lens cap was off — i know, because i was looking through the eyepiece at these great shots i had (seriously, i had a great position). besides, it didn’t record black. it recorded NOTHING.

    By bz on Sep 25, 2006

  7. Thank the Gods. My soul is intact.

    All things happen for a reason. It was good to see you anyway.

    I saw you sitting there with the blinking red light, wondering how the presentation would “show up” on video. Thanks for relieving me of that manifestation.

    I’m with )on. Let’s see a reenactment.

    By Nick on Sep 25, 2006

  8. >I’m with )on. Let’s see a reenactment.

    you mean … including the hopper incident?

    i had some GREAT vantage points, nick. no official cameraman to get in the way this time. good closeups on some of your pulls (noticeably slower than both lena’s and michelle’s) and the cupping setup.

    NOT THAT IT MATTERS.

    By bz on Sep 25, 2006

  9. These morsels are better than any camera angle. The hopper incident, in my mind’s eye, is a blur of pink and brown. And slow pours… oh my god.

    I’m sure everyone involved will be a part of telling a good story.

    By )on on Sep 25, 2006

  10. Ouch. My condolences on the camera problem. Many things mechanical seem to be acting up on you lately (car,tea,camera).

    Your wife may have satisfied several of the requirements to be nominated for sainthood.

    By mikep on Sep 25, 2006

  11. >Your wife may have satisfied several of the requirements to be nominated for sainthood.

    THAT’s how i’ll tell her!

    you raise a good point about the mechanical items. i’m still levering shots. haven’t had a spare second to open up the tay-AH.

    By bz on Sep 25, 2006

  12. Pink? As in Puffy/Andre 3000/Russell Simmons/Ashton Kuchar pink?

    So 2004.

    I guess this means we won’t get to see Nick competing in the MARBC. However, since we try to copy everything the Cho does, Melanie insists she’s going to enter this year and take up the “shop owner” challenge. She’s even spouting off about payign for some Riddlage.

    But I’m not letting her wear pink.

    Anyway, congrats Nick and Daryn and Lem.

    By Rich Westerfield on Sep 25, 2006

  13. )on’s comment caused a genuine laugh out loud moment.

    You must be gutted about the footage. Your descriptions do a great job though.

    At least do a shadow puppets version….

    By Hoffmann on Sep 25, 2006

  14. don’t tempt me with the re-enactment thing. my kid has a TON of finger puppets.

    riddlage? what’s riddlage?

    By bz on Sep 25, 2006

  15. ok, fine. a reenactment:

    http://ben.szobody.com/blog/index.php?title=serbc_the_lost_footage&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1

    By bz on Sep 27, 2006

Post a Comment