Comments on: festive scroogey vigilantism http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/12/22/festive_scroogey_vigilatism/ Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:52:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Nathanael http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/12/22/festive_scroogey_vigilatism/comment-page-1/#comment-527 Nathanael Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:26:28 +0000 #comment-527 well, no, but I was curious enough to check out the website :) well, no, but I was curious enough to check out the website :)

]]> By: bz http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/12/22/festive_scroogey_vigilatism/comment-page-1/#comment-526 bz Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:36:17 +0000 #comment-526 advert, nuthin. apple isn't afraid to mention pc in its own ads. why? because they're confident in the sum effect, and that people will not easily misconstrue it.<br /> <br /> why ... are you thinking about going? ;) advert, nuthin. apple isn’t afraid to mention pc in its own ads. why? because they’re confident in the sum effect, and that people will not easily misconstrue it.

why … are you thinking about going? ;)

]]> By: Nathanael http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2006/12/22/festive_scroogey_vigilatism/comment-page-1/#comment-525 Nathanael Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:50:33 +0000 #comment-525 i'm sure port city java appreciates the free advertisement tho. i’m sure port city java appreciates the free advertisement tho.

]]>