Comments on: obscure spro goes glossy http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/ Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:52:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Nick http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/comment-page-1/#comment-6629 Nick Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:51:19 +0000 http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/#comment-6629 Siobhan et al., just to be clear, I hate every photo of me in the history of the world. Flattered and embarrassed. And horrified. I hope people don't cancel their subscriptions at the sight of my weak-chinned, two-headed totem! Siobhan et al., just to be clear, I hate every photo of me in the history of the world. Flattered and embarrassed. And horrified.

I hope people don’t cancel their subscriptions at the sight of my weak-chinned, two-headed totem!

]]> By: bz http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/comment-page-1/#comment-6619 bz Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:59:14 +0000 http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/#comment-6619 i'm a demanding mag subscriber. and 'imbibe,' i'll say, has my attention. siobhan: nice work. more blogging! i’m a demanding mag subscriber. and ‘imbibe,’ i’ll say, has my attention.

siobhan: nice work. more blogging!

]]> By: James Hoffmann http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/comment-page-1/#comment-6608 James Hoffmann Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:26:27 +0000 http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/#comment-6608 Love the shots of Nick, made me chuckle. Might see if I can read someone's copy whilst I visit, as the magazine never really justified my subscription (as an non-US coffee professional - I am not saying it is a bad magazine, just not right for me at the moment though perhaps I might subscribe again through the company....) Love the shots of Nick, made me chuckle.

Might see if I can read someone’s copy whilst I visit, as the magazine never really justified my subscription (as an non-US coffee professional – I am not saying it is a bad magazine, just not right for me at the moment though perhaps I might subscribe again through the company….)

]]> By: Siobhan http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/comment-page-1/#comment-6592 Siobhan Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:21:31 +0000 http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/#comment-6592 Nick, you make a great centerfold. ;) Specialty coffee meta-narrative, never thought of it that way. Thanks! Nick, you make a great centerfold. ;)

Specialty coffee meta-narrative, never thought of it that way. Thanks!

]]> By: bz http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/comment-page-1/#comment-6580 bz Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:04:40 +0000 http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/#comment-6580 ah, nick. it's like a monster eharmony ad ... but classier! ah, nick. it’s like a monster eharmony ad … but classier!

]]> By: Nick http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/comment-page-1/#comment-6569 Nick Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:35:14 +0000 http://www.chemicallyimbalanced.org/2008/02/27/obscure-spro-goes-glossy/#comment-6569 For the record: I'm sooooo embarrassed. And gawd I hate those photos they chose. For the record: I’m sooooo embarrassed.

And gawd I hate those photos they chose.

]]>